Please take a moment to read and sign the petition. If we can get enough public support, we stand a very good chance of making this a reality...
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/michiganbassregulations/
Interesting, but I find it a little funny that there is an option for petition signers names to be published, but that the petition circulators name is not available. Before I would add my name to any petition, I would like to know who is circulating it. That's just me.
Easy, the first signature is me!
Kory W. Boozer
Just a side note: I figured it would be available due to the extensive amount of stuff I had to fill out to create the petition. Guess not, but not trying to hide or anything. I am not some big wig Bass angler, just merely a Michigan resident who lives on a reservoir in the Saint Joseph River system and would love to be able to chase some Smallies during what is now the "closed season". After speaking with a MDNR employee it would appear this could be a possible change that could be made if there is enough support, therefore I started the petition...
I signed it. Great "next step".
I signed the petition but I want to clear up the verbiage in the petition.
Petition States:
"This petition is in regards to changing the current Michigan Bass regulations in order to do away with the current closed season in all areas of the state and change it to a catch & release season. The current catch & release seasons in all areas would stay the same as would the current open seasons in all areas."
The first line says to me that we want a statewide catch and release season, expect when we have catch and keep, IE: Sat before Memorial Day to December.
Then the second line tells me we want no changes to the current C & R season nor changes to the C & K season.
???
Are we asking for No Closed Season aka catch and keep all the time or are we asking for a longer Catch and Immediate Release Season or are we asking for a Catch and Immediate Release Season Only, meaning no catch and keep. I didn't find the petition to be very clear on what we want.
I'm not trying to be a jerk, I just want this to be clear so we don't end up with less then what we started with.
Cy
i think it clearly states that we want a catch and immediately realease season where we know have a closed season and everything else will stay the same,sat. before mem. still will be tournament season or catch and keep..........i'm for no season at all.... :-\'
The ONLY change I am petitioning for is to take the current CLOSED season all over the state and make it immediate CATCH & RELEASE. I am not petitioning for any other change than that.
I see this as a realistic goal and one that would benefit a lot of different entities WITHOUT hurting the resource we all enjoy so much.
I signed the petition but would prefer it asked for a lifting of any seasonal restriction for targeting bass. Obviously I would like to see the bag limit at 5 fish per angler but see no reason to seperate a catch and release from a catch and keep season although I am not opposed to it. It just makes more sense to ask for more than you expect to recieve so that it appears that you are reaching a compromise.
Signed, sealed and delivered
I spoke with a source at the Michigan DNR today in regards to this petition.
Basically I was told the best route to get this really given some serious consideration would be to get as many "clubs" involved as possible. Not just Bass fishing clubs, but also Musky fishing groups and any Walleye fishing groups I could. The reason being, a large part of the reasoning behind having a closed season for Bass is due to the fact it's tough for the Conservation Officers to enforce against people fishing during the closed Walleye season or Musky/Pike season if Bass fishing is open as the angler could just say "I am fishing for Bass". Therefore if we could get the groups who support the Walleye and Musky/Pike fishery to support the ending of a closed Bass season there would likely be zero resistance from the Michigan DNR to end the closed season on Bass fishing.
So if any of you know of any Bass, Walleye or Musky/Pike clubs please do what you can to spread the word and get all the support you can. This is something that we can get changed, it will just take support from a lot of people. This petition is just a start, but is a great way to show how serious we are. If you know of any other forums or any other type of fishing related sites, please post a link to the petition.
Signed it. We need a whole lot more signatures than 36 to get this done. I understand that it just went up, so hopefully our voices are heard. Good job on starting this.
hancocked.
1jav
As discussed on the other thread, easiest way to get other types of clubs signed on (if possible) is for someone to get on the MUCC fisheries committee and get them to agree to it.
Getting this accomplished will be one of the main obstacles for more change.
Of course, I have always felt that to punish good people because of a few bad ones is not right even if it seems easier. If someone keeps a fish out of season, give them a ticket. Otherwise, leave them alone except for special needs.
Quote from: djkimmel on April 08, 2010, 11:08:47 PM
As discussed on the other thread, easiest way to get other types of clubs signed on (if possible) is for someone to get on the MUCC fisheries committee and get them to agree to it.
Getting this accomplished will be one of the main obstacles for more change.
Of course, I have always felt that to punish good people because of a few bad ones is not right even if it seems easier. If someone keeps a fish out of season, give them a ticket. Otherwise, leave them alone except for special needs.
and how would one go about getting on the MUCC fisheries committee
I personally would like to give more credit than is being given to the Conservation Officers. The two local CO's around here I have no doubt in my mind could easily tell if someone was Bass fishing or Walleye/Pike/Musky fishing. They weren't born yesterday and do this for a living.
So the whole argument that it's to make it easier for CO's to make sure nobody is chasing other species during their closed season in my opinion doesn't have much of a leg to stand on.
Quote from: bigjc on April 08, 2010, 11:40:02 PM
Quote from: djkimmel on April 08, 2010, 11:08:47 PM
As discussed on the other thread, easiest way to get other types of clubs signed on (if possible) is for someone to get on the MUCC fisheries committee and get them to agree to it.
Getting this accomplished will be one of the main obstacles for more change.
Of course, I have always felt that to punish good people because of a few bad ones is not right even if it seems easier. If someone keeps a fish out of season, give them a ticket. Otherwise, leave them alone except for special needs.
and how would one go about getting on the MUCC fisheries committee
I was wondering that too. Dan can you give us some details?
Quote from: wounded minnow on April 09, 2010, 07:46:22 AM
I personally would like to give more credit than is being given to the Conservation Officers. The two local CO's around here I have no doubt in my mind could easily tell if someone was Bass fishing or Walleye/Pike/Musky fishing. They weren't born yesterday and do this for a living.
So the whole argument that it's to make it easier for CO's to make sure nobody is chasing other species during their closed season in my opinion doesn't have much of a leg to stand on.
This has always been my position, however, CO's should not be tasked with determining what an angler is fishing for. Fishing season is either open or closed. Now possesion is a different story. Some of these cases have been tried in a court of law and the angler usually comes out on top. You can't ticket an angler for illegal fishing on a body of water that has an open fishing season, if he is not in possesion of any fish. It is tough for a CO to prove that the angler intended for a particular fish to bite a lure. Be it a bass, pike, walleye, muskie, drum, carp, blue gill, crappie, perch..... I have caught them all on the same lure.
Don't forget catfish...I've caught more than one on those stinky gulp drop shot gobies...I caught what probably would have been the state record freshwater drum on Muskegon on a jerkbait before I knew what the current record was. Of course I threw it back without second thought...
I think if the DNRE tried to make the argument for not extending the season, one could legitimately refer to their success in getting prior tickets through. If they can't enforce it, even when it is law, how would extending the C&R season really change anything?
True! Also Salmon and Sturgeon. You really never know what you are going to catch when fishing I don't care what species you are fishing for.
Quote from: MadWags on April 09, 2010, 09:00:07 AM
Quote from: wounded minnow on April 09, 2010, 07:46:22 AM
I personally would like to give more credit than is being given to the Conservation Officers. The two local CO's around here I have no doubt in my mind could easily tell if someone was Bass fishing or Walleye/Pike/Musky fishing. They weren't born yesterday and do this for a living.
So the whole argument that it's to make it easier for CO's to make sure nobody is chasing other species during their closed season in my opinion doesn't have much of a leg to stand on.
This has always been my position, however, CO's should not be tasked with determining what an angler is fishing for. Fishing season is either open or closed. Now possesion is a different story. Some of these cases have been tried in a court of law and the angler usually comes out on top. You can't ticket an angler for illegal fishing on a body of water that has an open fishing season, if he is not in possesion of any fish. It is tough for a CO to prove that the angler intended for a particular fish to bite a lure. Be it a bass, pike, walleye, muskie, drum, carp, blue gill, crappie, perch..... I have caught them all on the same lure.
I agree 100% with Wags. If you don't have fish in the box...who is to say that you're not just a novice that fishes for Blue Gills with a stick bait or dog fish with a rattle trap because you don't know any better? I don't know how you can control fishing for one species and not another...I don't think you can. That's why we have closed seasons and that's why the C & R Bass season opens when Walleye and Pike do. However I do think that you can open a season for C & R all species and have a separate catch and keep season for all species. Those that are going to catch and keep fish during the C & R already fish out of season and those that follow the law now will continue to. Those that just love to fish and catch and release will be thrilled with new regulations and so will the tackle shops. Shoot if the state whats their cut have a license for each season. You are required to pay more to fish the C & R season.
Cy
Been quite a while since I was on the committee or the MUCC board of directors so I'm checking on what the latest practices are.
I have a close friend who is currently in the State House and we have discussed this subject. One of the best ways of getting a open season of any kind for bass, is to provide them with the one thing that will make them take notice - money. Tournament fishing brings in many more dollars to local economies and to the state, than casual fisherman. So, if it was worded to be a catch and release, but allow tournament weigh-ins, then release, both for bass and walleye, we might get legislative action. Then, the DNR would not be able to ever change it. Just my two cents.
Well 111 signatures and climbing!
I have been asked by many people what on Earth I plan to do with the signatures once I get them. Well after a lot of thought here is what I plan to do with them. I am open to any other suggestions anyone may have as well...
1) The website/service hosting the petition gives me the ability to print out the whole petition including all the signatures. So I will print out several copies of the petition.
2) I will include a letter that I am going to start working on stating all the reasons why the Michigan DNRE should consider doing away with the closed Bass season statewide and turning that season into catch & immediate release. (Scientific Studies, Economical Impact, etc...)
3) I am going to work on getting statements from Michigan businesses that support the changes and why they support them. Not just tackle shops, but Michigan based tackle companies, restaurants, motels, etc...
4) It would help me out tremendously if you guys could help me out with a list of businesses I should contact for statements. Like I said, tackle shops, Michigan tackle companies, motels, restaurants, etc... If any of you own businesses like this, PLEASE send me a statement of why you support the change via email to woundedminnow@ymail.com I will then print and submit with the rest of the stuff.
Now, who will I be sending these packets of information to???
Basically I will be mailing out this information to the Michigan DNRE and any Michigan Congress members, Michigan Senators, Michigan's Governor's office, etc... Basically any entity that is somebody in the State of Michigan will receive a packet. Hopefully it will be enough to turn enough heads to make something happen.
I think we all know 111 signatures is NOT going to turn very many heads, therefore I need all of you to do everything you can to increase the amount of signatures on the petition. We need signatures not only from Michigan residents, but anyone who travels to Michigan to fish for Bass. I plan to leave the petition open until Friday, May 14th. After that I will be printing it out and putting together the packets to put in the mail. I am hoping that is enough time to get 1,000+ signatures on there.
Thank you for your time,
Kory
Quote from: Puma on April 10, 2010, 12:27:09 AM
I have a close friend who is currently in the State House and we have discussed this subject. One of the best ways of getting a open season of any kind for bass, is to provide them with the one thing that will make them take notice - money. Tournament fishing brings in many more dollars to local economies and to the state, than casual fisherman. So, if it was worded to be a catch and release, but allow tournament weigh-ins, then release, both for bass and walleye, we might get legislative action. Then, the DNR would not be able to ever change it. Just my two cents.
yeah - how about making it so a BASS elite series or FLW event could come and fish St Clair or saginaw bay in April or MAY! talk about big $$$ coming in and a great tournament for either tour.
When it comes to money you have to think big - why don't we get big-time elite series events EVERY year or big-time FLW events - we have more freshwater and THE most acres of the best smallie water in the world - yet we rarely see a huge event. Let the big boys come in and bring their wallets draw some attention to the sport and pump some dollars into local economies
I'm sure Bay City, Saginaw and Detroit would all be more than happy to see a few outside dollars come trickling through.
We need some of our Michigan elite (like KVD and Zona ) to get on this bandwagon.
Yeah, St. Clair is approximately 22 miles by 24 miles...should be enough fishing spots for 102 Elite series boats. Van Dam said at the D&R seminar that St. Clair is the hottest smallie lake in the world right now. Why wouldn't they have a tourney of that caliber? They'll drive to Cali to fish. Seems like this would be a little closer! Can you imagine them going over 100 lbs w/ smallmouth? That would be pretty cool.
Contact the motels and campgrounds in Cheboygan, I bet they will have your back. Pretty sure the BFL on Burt/Mullett is keeping that place alive.
Quote from: Fishmael on April 12, 2010, 04:31:54 PM
Yeah, St. Clair is approximately 22 miles by 24 miles...should be enough fishing spots for 102 Elite series boats. Van Dam said at the D&R seminar that St. Clair is the hottest smallie lake in the world right now. Why wouldn't they have a tourney of that caliber? They'll drive to Cali to fish. Seems like this would be a little closer! Can you imagine them going over 100 lbs w/ smallmouth? That would be pretty cool.
Part of the problem getting more large tournaments into Michigan, and St. Clair in particular, has been a lack of support and interest from the local community in hosting the tournament. When given a choice between good fishing in one location, and local support in dollars and services in another area, they will most often pick the location providing support.
Last I knew, Metro Beach was even charging the big tournaments a large fee to have their event there. If I had someone charging me and another someone offering me free or even an incentive, I would not pick the one that charges me no matter how good the fishing. Especially in this very tough economy with the tournament organizations not doing real well.
Some type of plan to get local communities behind and showing they want bigger tournaments here would also be important on that end. Though, as I mentioned before, tying tournaments directly to a bass season change decreases the odds of success in Michigan at this time.
As I voiced my opinion in the other thread. I would also like an extended CXR season but, we have to be clever on how we go about wording this petition. Or it may come back to hunt us.
Quote from: Got Fish?? on April 13, 2010, 08:11:30 PM
As I voiced my opinion in the other thread. I would also like an extended CXR season but, we have to be clever on how we go about wording this petition. Or it may come back to hunt us.
Couldn't agree more with Got Fish??. Phrasing in a petition is key. The verbage coming back to haunt us could be fatal. A petition should be run by a lawyer first so that the interpretation is clear and concise.
BD ;D
I'd go out and try to sign up a few lawyers as members but I don't want everyone mad at me ;D
Please remember he was nice enough to do something and this is not a petition to meet Michigan legal petition rules. More just to show that there is a lot of interest in getting a real movement started. It is valuable for that reason. The legal stuff will come later.
Quote from: djkimmel on April 22, 2010, 11:25:25 AM
Please remember he was nice enough to do something and this is not a petition to meet Michigan legal petition rules. More just to show that there is a lot of interest in getting a real movement started. It is valuable for that reason. The legal stuff will come later.
So how do we start the legal stuff now?
I do not think a lack of support will be a road block at all; the road block(s) will be a lack of agreement between anglers as to what specific action should or should not be taken and why. For example I personally think there should be a distinction between Possession and Harvest - this is nor never would be a gray area for CO's, a stringer is a stringer, an ice box is an ice box, and a Livewell is a Livewell. Personally I think Catch & Release is the ultimate gray area - is it immediate release or pic and immediate release? Is there is a time limit on how long you can have that fish in the boat? Is it kosher to take measurements of the fish? Is it OK to put a fish in a Bag-Em Bass Bag to weigh it on the boat or does that violate C&R Season policy? A CO's job is all ready complicated enough so lets simplify things for them and simply provide a distinction between HARVEST & Catch Release. Are not all tournaments Catch & Release?
According to DNR & the now disbanded SALBRC Committee report from 2008 using information from over 10 years ago (USFWS 1999, USFWS and USBOC 2001) over 30% of all licensed anglers in Michigan primarily target bass; they then go on to site the national explosion of tournament participation trends - right after they cite that MI has the 4th HIGHEST TOURNAMENT PARTICIPATION IN THE COUNTRY they go to say that the #5 state in participation had seen a 55% growth in a 4 year period. Then they drop the "Currently we have no definitive numbers on the trend of bass fishing tournaments in Michigan".
Because they have no "definitive numbers" they conclude that tournament anglers only make up only 0.1% of Michigan's fishing population by only counting Federation Club Numbers. Ironically the 0.1% is probably the number of MI tournament anglers who are actually in a Federation Club. This survey does not really provide any meat outside of its very CONSERVATIVE estimate on the economic impact Bass Fishing has in Michigan - "An estimate of the total economic impact of bass fishing activity in Michigan, $321 million annually, should be considered a minimum given that bass fishing is probably the most heavily marketed fishery of all species and most sponsored fishing tournaments are directed at bass (Schramm et al. 1991)". Let's do the disbanded committee of the Smallmouth and Largemouth Bass Regulations Committee (SALBRC) and the DNR a favor and get them more "definitive numbers" - I don't any tournament organization in MI that wouldn't prodive this information in a 2 minute phone call or 1 sentence email.
Basically this entire survey/study concludes that Bass Fishing is a CASH COW for the State and then spends the rest of time trying to minimize Tournament Anglers in the grand scheme of things. This is a prime example of political/special interests groups slanting the perceived truth in order to push the agenda(s) of more organized fishing and conservation subgroups that could care less about those green and brown fish. This is why we need to do this right, I understand it is give-get when dealing in these matters but if we let common sense guide the way there is no valid reason not allow an extended Catch & Release Tournament Season as well. The DNR would never have to Boomshock or pay for college kids and/or hippies to do creel surveys on Bass Lakes where tournaments are held because every tournament would be a free creel survey - and it would be Free! Why stop there; might as well contact Toyota to get them to fund the Toyota Michigan Share-a-Lunker program - better yet why not call Ford or GM seeing as they reside here anyways.
My as usual overly long-winded point is why not do something right the 1st time; quite honestly the extended C&R simply substitutes one gray area with another - I don't mind gray but BLACK & WHITE looks much better.......
We need to get this petition over to Jack or Jim because they could most likely get the desired 1000 John Hannock's in just a few days.
Also why is it that BASS Anglers are by FAR HANDS DOWN THE LARGEST MAJORITY of Anglers in Michigan but get stipened by a 10-man Musky Club? Organizating efforts would make the 100,000 MUCC members look subtle so let's figure that one out so we can start implenting common sense change vs. political clout.
There is no gray in Michigan catch and release. It specifically states immediate release.
SALBRC was not a good representation of nonbiased, non-agenda work. Luckily, things have improved quite a bit since then so, despite the possibility of a person or two who might not want to let that go, attitudes and a willingness to discuss this issue in an unbiased way should be much better now.
It was actually the larger, organized walleye groups that did not support having catch and immediate release bass start before walleye season.
Hunters and anglers are often slow to get together in large numbers, and often disagree more amongst themselves to hurt chances of getting things accomplished successfully without much 'help' from the general public. Which is why I stated somewhere earlier in this discussion that we should come to an agreement amongst ourselves first behind a common and acceptable compromise before we start getting other's involved. I did not enjoy speaking at all those meetings only to be undermined more by fellow bass anglers than by anyone else too often because of an unwillingness to accept a compromise that is feasible.
Maybe we should have a vote right now on here - can everyone accept and work towards just extending catch and immediate release the rest of the closed season? Or will some be determined to push for more aggressive options anyway? If enough of us disagree amongst ourselves, we will have a much harder road when we involve 'everyone.'
Granted, other proposals may be put out anyway if this goes 'public' but I would personally like to see 100% cooperation and agreement amongst ourselves rather than splinter (and weaken) our efforts. So, what does everyone think?
I'm talking about what you would accept not your ultimate dream season.
Now... if someone has the time and energy out there to drive a more aggressive platform and stick with it through the entire process, winning enough people over somehow, I'm not saying I would not provide and advice. And I have already provided a place for public discussion. It would take a very focused, determined and diplomatic person with a lot of free time during the day on their hands to have a chance at all if anything is said about having more remote weigh in bass tournaments on inland lakes.
I personally, would accept a C&R season for all of the year, not included in C&K season. Not my dream, but as Dan said, its a compromise.
I think its fine the way it stands today. Mr. Kimmel has made great strides in allowing us to pursue Bass almost 8 months a year. If we were a southern state where yearly growth rates are 2 to 3 times as great I would think differently. But here in the northern states Bass need a break.
As stated before the issue we will run into with this getting the 100% support from those who do actually care about what we are talking about. This is a perfect opportunity to actually make Michigan a desired Tournament destination for the majors and to make Michigan a Tournament Friendly location; it isn't all about tournaments but if you want to maximize the economic benefits we have to define the difference between C & R and Harvest. I'd really like to know how many tickets are issued for guys fishing for Bass "out of season" because the last time I talked to a CO from the Plainwell office he soley responsible for 100 launch sites so I don't think he spends much time in the woods with binoculars in March and April trying to catch guys whacking bass. As far as being a Northern state we should have the ability to whack bass anytime we want; growth rates are slower simply because of water temp. and metabolism; water temperature plays the largerst role in mortality so the fish that need the break are down south where water temps. get into 80's every year. If there is any closing of anything it should be when water temps. reach a certain temperature vs. some random guess on when bass are spawning each year.
Are we going to fix everything no but we shouldn't concede common sense just because that is what we do in Michigan - common sense seems to be lacking here in Michigan so it would be nice change of pace if we did something because the right thing to do. Lets get a poll up with some different language or least discuss what that different language is. My vote is distinguish the difference between harvest and C & R so that tournaments can be run in as soon as there is open water; instead of everyone from Michigan driving to Kentucky or Indiana they could drive up here to fish lakes actually worth the drive. We have more freshwater than anyone else in the world so let's try and actually utilize it a little more.
Kory already started the fire so let's add some gas and get this thing cooking......
Ok, I have read the petition, every posting...I am a bit lost Why do we "need" this?
I have not seen or read any real reason why this is needed...
Am I correct that it is a "want"?
Just trying to understand, the process and reason behind this
Many Michigan bass anglers want to fish as soon as there is open water.
But it is illegal to even attempt to catch bass until the last Saturday in April in the Lower Peninsula and May 15 in the Upper Peninsula.
If there is no scientific proof that bass need that protection of a completely closed season (there isn't);
Considering we voted a few years ago in Michigan to approve and support scientific management of our fish and game resources (Proposal D or G - been a while);
We should allow a longer legal bass season for those who wish to fish a longer bass season.
Granted, many anglers already do fish bass out of season and have for about 30 years now with some frequency, some of us choose to follow the law and would also like to fish more legally.
The petition is trying to say simply, make it legal to catch and release bass the rest of the calendar year that is not already part of the regular possession season - approximately Memorial weekend to December 31, give or take.
To be effective here, I truly think it is important to reach a consensus first that we can all live with before we push it out to a wider audience. If we are fractured even amongst ourselves, any change will be much harder. If we can't compromise here and come up with something we can settle for, how good might we do with a wider audience that will include lake associations, walleye anglers, musky anglers, possibly anti's, people who believe bass need to be protected, etc., etc.
As I have said, anyone who wants to pass a bass season change right now that involves tournaments with a remote weigh in must be prepared for a very tough and intense effort. You're talking a ton of day time for phone calls, interviews, public meetings, meetings with involved parties (lake associations), maybe legislators and convincing fellow anglers to go along, some of whom do not like competitive fishing, yet still get a say. If a suitable person does not step forward who can do that for at least probably the next 12 months, we may not get any change.
I would love to have the time to do that, and to believe common sense and financial information would win the day, but I can't do something like this at this time. And I do not believe telling the legislature and/or the MDNRE how good it will before the economy will overrule lake associations and others who do not want more tournaments.
I feel pretty good that this early in the new situation that I'm already hearing and seeing signs that we might have a chance to get more catch and release fishing anyway. After taking 20 years to just get a statewide extension, this seems amazing to me.
Quote from: Dinkfinder on April 24, 2010, 10:15:43 PM
Ok, I have read the petition, every posting...I am a bit lost Why do we "need" this?
I have not seen or read any real reason why this is needed...
Am I correct that it is a "want"?
Just trying to understand, the process and reason behind this
How do you classify needs & wants? Water is a "need", food is a "need". Catching Bass during one of the most exciting times of the year is "want", not having to lie about bass fishing on 80 degree days the 1st week of April is a "want", not having to drive down to Indiana, Ohio, Kentucky, Texas, and Florida to fish a tournament in April is a "want", producing some of the sickest fishing video's ever before seen is a "want".
Try watching your Todd Glover Video 1 again (looking forward to more of this stuff by the way - nice work!); Todd clearly lays out the deal about how great the bass fishing in Michigan when he talks about how the TN & KY guys that come up here are so shocked that we have such awesome fishing - the reason those guys are shocked is because Michigan does NOTHING to promote it's Bass Fishing and seems to actually discourage Tournament Fishing which is the real economic stimulator.
So to answer your question directly this petition is the start of what the state with the worst economy in the country "needs". Right now there are probably over 200 trucks and boats driving down to Indiana to fish a tournament; why because they can't fish a tournament here in Michigan and this is the best time of year to fish. Why can't we fish a tournament here in Michigan - because the Bass Anglers have not gotten together to collectively agree on anything and seem to be OK with picking up the majority of the tab for walleye, steelhead, and other species to be stocked and studied while they sit and wait for a random day in April to even be able to go out and admittingly fish for bass. I would have to say that each of these Michigan anglers spends about $300 to $1000 dollars on a trip to Patoka or Wawasee; and because Indiana uses common sense they will see all of that money spent in their state.
Wouldn't it have been nice to go out with Todd Glover and film Part One on Lake Orion the 1st week in April when water temps were already in the mid-50's and as he is talking about the big fish he sticks a piggy on camera? But you couldn't have filmed that because it is "illegal" to target bass; it just wouldn't be fair to the walleye and musky anglers who pale in comparison to the amount of bass anglers in the state. Is that a "need" for you - no it isn't but I hope it would be a "want" simply for your business. The entire thing boils down to misinformation and politics; Michigan "needs" all the help it can get and this petition is the start of something trying to meet those "needs". No one gains from not allowing C&R earlier here; and not being able to fish a tournament that is simply just a delayed version of the current Early Catch & Release isn't doing anyone but Indiana any favors - the fish do not benefit from this if you look all the research available.
As far as the process that is something that DK can help you with because he has already went through it - he won that long and stressful battle (we were less than a stones throw away from looking at a July 1st opener so General DK deserves his 5th Star for that one! An induction the Sport Fishing Hall of Fame follow). This petition aims at winning another battle -
winning the war on common sense should be the goal of all Bass Anglers in Michigan; until we put egos aside and start agreeing that this is a "need" this could last longer Iraq (I started the war based theme so I thought I'd just go with it!)
Does that help at all or did the rambling rant further confuse? Would your business benefit from being able to produce some of the hottest fishing action ever seen? It might not be a "need" or even or a "want" for you but for Michigan businesses and residents it most definitely is a "need".
Dan posted a few while typing my usual essay - my vote is to draft something similar but with language that differentiates Harvest and Possesion so Todd Glover's KY & TN boys don't ask him to come down there; instead they'll have it on their calendar to be here for a couple of weekends in April and early May. Even if it is a limited number of tourney permits or something on larger bodies we just shouldn't have to go spend all that money in other states in April and May especially when have far superior water with far superior fishing. Maybe throw in some Toyota Share A Lunker verbage too (this is a dream but I guess you never know!) - think of what that program would do with the Smallies on St. Clair!
Thanks, I got it....
Well, May 15th has come and gone, there is a total of 205 signatures which in reality, is not enough support to really make a difference. I can say it saddens me people would not be happy with just being able to fish, 90% of the emails I got were, I could care less if it's open if I can't fish tournaments, which maybe it's because I'm just a fish bum who enjoys fishing and has no desire to compete but seems rather ridiculous to me. To each his own though and not knocking anyone.
I will print the signatures and send it in to the DNR, but don't see it going anywhere, every organization that I was told would need to support it has stated they do not without further studies being done on the impact it would have. Pretty much everyone agrees you can't compare our fishery to that of Southern States or even surrounding states. I'm no biologist so have no real opinion, I would love to chase Smallies early in the year and know what I would be doing would have no negative impact on the fishery, but maybe it would if I was farther North as many people seem to think it would.
Although the response, 200+ signatures out of 1400+ members is far from a valid statistical sampling, it would seem to indicate that the majority is not in favor of a longer tournament season or are indifferent towards the prospect. With all the work it took for Dan K. and his group to get an extended catch and release season and the give and take that occurred (losing a month of C&R on 6 inland lakes)I would say this endeavor might be fruitless. (Just my opinion)
Hang in their a short time guys. I haven't even talked to the MDNRE about this yet, but I have already heard through the grapevine that feelers have been put out to others from THEIR direction. That is a good sign.
I realize some people just want to have more tournaments, but that really is another, separate issue with its own challenges and needs. (Some also want to have less tournaments during the hot months by having some during the cool months, which is an interesting alternative.)
We definitely can't have them if there is no season. Change is hard for many people and takes time. I have some things in the works to help this process out. I wish I could get them done faster, but all things take time. There are many, many more anglers who just want to fish for bass and I think of everyone with these types of changes. It is with the numbers that we can get things changed, not just with members from this site. I noticed there were people on that petition who are not members of this site.
Please be patient and think of the end goal. More bass fishing as long as the resource can allow it.
Signed, is this thing dead in the water?
Never dead. Just delayed a little.
What will this do for tournament fishing? is this a strict catch and delayed release proposal?
I believe that petition was written just to allow a longer catch and immediate release season only.
Signed.
BD ;D